I've recently managed to hornswaggle a Warhammer-centric friend into trying historicals—AWI Sharp Practice, to be precise—and to my immense gratification he's decided to go all in on collecting a force of his own.

I've been doing my best to pass on my accumulated knowledge vis a vis manufacturers, historical details, units, etc., and (having settled on a collection of Queen's Rangers) we are now at the "oh, sorry, forgot to mention that you have to buy your own bases" phase of the indoctrination process.

Accordingly, I put together a little buying guide, based on my own aesthetic preferences. He suggested I post it to this very blog, as he felt others might find it as useful as he, and so here we are!

Without further ado...

Sharp Practice Bases: A Buying Guide

Regular infantry are 8 figures, ranked 4x2

Militia are 10 figures, ranked 5x2

Skirmishers are 6 figures, clustered

Tribal bands are 12 figures, clustered

Cavalry are 8 figures, ranked 4x2

Artillery are a single gun with 4-5 crew

For most bases and trays, I recommend Warbases.

Pick up 20mm circular bases for all infantry figures—your choice of 2mm or 3mm thickness (depends on how thicc you like it):

https://warbases.co.uk/product/circular-bases/

For infantry leaders, you could put them on square bases, or 25mm bases, or pick up these custom sabots from Lasercast in Oz:

https://lasercast.bigcartel.com/product/command-trays

For cavalry of all types, go with 50x25mm bases:

https://warbases.co.uk/product/25mm-premier-bases/

For artillery, I found these guys in the US:

https://www.greenstuffindustries.com/store/p120/Sharp_Practice_Artillery_Crew_Tray.html

Or just a nice slap o’ plastic or basswood would do too. :P

For movement trays, we return once again to Warbases…

You’ll need to make sure the “thickness” of the recess on the tray matches the thickness of the base you’ve chosen. Once you’ve done that, just select the appropriate dimensions (4x2 or 5x2 for infantry units, 100mmx100mm for cavalry) and you’re good to go!

Formed infantry (2mm depth): https://warbases.co.uk/product/regiment-tray-20mm-slots-2mm-top-layer/ 

Formed infantry (3mm depth): https://warbases.co.uk/product/regiment-tray-20mm-slots-3mm-top-layer/ 

Skirmishers: https://warbases.co.uk/product/dux-britzombie-tray-20mm-slots/ 

Cavalry: https://warbases.co.uk/product/close-order-tray-20mm-2/ 

Why Do We Paint?

When you come to think about it, painting miniatures could very well be the oddest part of this entire hobby, particularly in this day and age of pre-painted miniatures and professional painting services. Why spend countless eye-straining hours laboring over tiny figures long into the night? Even if you are lucky enough to get in multiple games a week, it's likely that you'll never spend as much time playing as you do painting. And then there's all the additional cost (both time and money) involved in gaining proficiency in painting itself!

And yet most of us persevere. Why?

My answer: self-expression.

We want to feel like our miniatures reflect a bit of our own creative vision. In fantasy wargaming (and the more obscure historical genres), this includes things like choosing uniform colors and other details of the figures' appearance, but even in your more rigidly-proscribed historical genres like Napoleonics or WWII, there's often room for more than a bit of creative flourish amongst the uniform plates and camo swatches.

And then there's your own personal style. Everyone has one, even if it's subtle. To my mind, there is no point in painting miniatures yourself if the result isn't obviously your own "brand" of painting, as it were. Yes, most of us watch tutorials and try to emulate a particular favored style. But if the end goal is to look just like a Kev Dallimore or Duncan Rhodes piece, I have to question why you would bother painting your own minis at all. Just find a professional painter who can ape your favored style and spend the money you would have otherwise on paints and painting supplies on commissions instead.

So that's all my subjective opinion, and YMMV and all that. Where I start to get a bit tetchy, as the Brits say, is when emulation of a particular style gets confused with being a "good" painter. It's all a bit Académie des Beaux-Arts, if you will.

A personal anecdote to illustrate my point:

I've been painting miniatures for literally 30 years at this point. I am happy with my level of painting proficiency, though I'm always pushing myself to try new techniques or up my skill level in this way or that. But, ultimately, I would call myself a "good" painter.

To that end, I have periodically engaged in painting miniatures for commission. I have never had an unhappy client, and have frequently had to turn down work because my queue got too full.

A few years ago, I was looking into taking my commission work to a more regular gig and so was looking to put my name out there. One of the bigger GW-adjacent wargaming YouTube channels at the time ran a painting service (they may still, for all I know) and had an offer for commission painters where, if you did some painting for them, they would advertise your services on their channel. I submitted a portfolio.

The response I got was one of the most condescending rejections I've ever received; it more or less said, "Hey, great effort buddy! Keep practicing and in a few years you might actually get good!"

At first, this really threw me for a loop, I have to say. But as I thought it over, I realized where they were coming from: I don't paint to GW standards. And in their world, painting to the GW standard is the sole marker for what constitutes "good" painting. How clean are those edge highlights? Tighten them up, or you'll never be a "good" painter! That kind of nonsense. After that insight, I had a good laugh and moved on.

But that insight has stuck with me ever since as illustrative of a much more pervasive attitude. And it's frankly bullshit. It's an attitude that turns the art of miniatures painting into a craft of paint-by-numbers.

Do your figures look badass on the table? Are you happy with them? Then you're a "good" painter. End of story.

Timely insights courtesy of @sonicsledge.

Yes, there are certain minimum technical bars we all should be clearing. There is, I believe, an objective definition of what constitutes a "bad" paint job. Beyond that, anything is fair game. Paint for yourself and your own enjoyment and satisfaction; nobody else's.

(Okay, you can also paint for the enjoyment of your gaming buddies who appreciate your efforts and ogle your figures when you put them on the table, but that's it!)

282 Days

 Last November, in the Before Times, I posted about starting up an Instagram account and getting a #hobbystreak thing going.

This past Saturday, for the first time in 282 days, I did not do anything miniatures related. I broke my streak.

Two hundred and eighty-two days. That's pretty impressive, I have to say. I've never done anything approaching that in my miniatures gaming hobby, and I've been at it for nearly 30 years!

Unsurprisingly, I got a lot done. I still have unpainted minis on my shelves, but their numbers are massively reduced. Once I finish my current project of WWII Eritrean Colonial Infantry for my East Africa 1940 project, I still have:

• Sisters of Battle
• Genestealer Cult
• Death Guard
• 28mm Gempei Samurai
• Some Warlords of Erehwon warbands

And that's about it! Each of the 40K projects are small, about 30-40 models a piece, and the Warlords warbands are even smaller (with the possible exception of the Goblins).

This is a massive shift from when I started back in November. In that time I've painted up three forces for Sharp Practice (two AWI, one Napoleonic), two 6mm Sengoku samurai armies, a WWII German platoon plus support, jump-off points for  Chain of Command, several classic Grenadier fantasy models for Warlords of Erehwon, and an assorted miscellany of other figures, plus taken on a handful of painting commissions.

Honestly, without those commissions I'd probably be done with the above list, or very close to it. My original intention was to break my streak in late July anyway, since I thought I'd be going to Gen Con, and my initial schedule had me getting everything except the Erehwon figures completed by then. But it's all good; I'm always happy to help other folks get painted figures on the table, and the cash helps pay for more minis (not that I'm buying too many of those these days), paint, and other supplies.

I'm optimistic I can get the rest of the above-named projects done by the end of the year. After that, I want to get back into experimenting with 2mm Napoleonics, as well as a special "black & white" WWII project and working on lots of terrain. I'll probably continue with my painting commissions as well.

But on the main, I'm anticipating 2021 will be my year for terrain projects the same way this has been my year for figure painting. Hopefully by then I can start hosting games in my house again...

Anyway, I'm really proud of the streak I hit and the progress I made, and after taking a few days off I'm itching to start up another streak. Let's see how long I can keep this one going, eh?

I'll leave off with photos of some of the projects I completed during my 282-day streak:

Hobby Streak Progress Report

It's been a little over a month since my last post, when I was just getting under way with my "hobby streak" project. As of this writing, I'm coming up on seven weeks of managing some kind of hobby-related work each and every night, without a break. Even though I've fallen off my initial projected pace, I'm really pleased with my progress and seem to have found a rhythm that works well for me.

Partly this is because I reorganized my display shelves and projects, consolidating my plans. I'll be painting fewer figures, which keeps me on pace to hit my goal. Even better, by pacing myself I've managed to heal up from the incipient carpal tunnel pain that had started plaguing my painting hand, as discussed in a previous post. Phew!

So what do I have to show for my seven weeks of work? Oh...nothing much...except for two full Sharp Practice American War for Independence (AWI) forces, that's all!

The Continental and British forces are each straight out of their respective sections in the rulebook, the "Sundry Rebels" and the "Mixed Regular Force" lists, respectively.

Both forces are loosely based, in terms of units modeled, on the orders of battle from Brandywine, 1777. I selected from the list based on some of my own family history—the colonies my ancestors were living in during the war, and the regions of Britain they'd come from, as the case may be.

The Continentals

The list calls for two Rebel Militia units and two State Line Troops as the core companies. The Militia hail from Maryland, while the State Line are from Pennsylvania. Joining them are two units of Riflemen.

Supporting units include a light cannon and a company from the 4th Continental Light Dragoons; this latter unit was a must-have, as my direct patrilineal ancestor James Larkins rode with them! Unfortunately, as I got started painting, I realized I'd ordered the wrong type of model. The 4th Dragoons were still wearing confiscated British infantry jackets in 1777, and wouldn't switch to green jackets and Tarleton helmets until 1780 at the earliest. So it goes. These will do for now.

Here's the complete force, by regiment group:

Weirdly, two of the figures do bear the earlier uniform. I think I ordered all at the same time? Anyway, it would be perfect for representing the unit during the transitional period of 1780–81, when not everyone had the new kit, and it means I only have to order and paint six of the older uniforms when I get around to it.

The Hated British

The core mixed British force consists of companies drawn from the 1st Light Infantry Battalion (painted as elements of the Royal Welch Fusiliers) and Fraser's Highlanders of the 71st Foot. In support is a medium artillery piece, a company of Hessian Grenadiers, and a unit of the Queen's Rangers Hussar (Loyalist) cavalry. There's also a unit of Woodland Indians I painted up to either serve as allies or in special scenarios and that I'm quite happy with.

All in all, I'm really looking forward to seeing how these forces play out on the table. If everything goes well, I should be getting a game in by mid-January; I might do a solo test game before then to really nail down the rules, too.

I'll also hopefully (finally) get around to that long-delayed Malifaux game mentioned in the last post and that got repeatedly put off due to holiday scheduling conflicts. Might even get my Epic Titans on the table for a game of Adeptus Titanicus before the next couple weeks are out. We shall see.

As always, if anything comes of these plans, I'll be sure to post pictures and summaries of the games here!